Calibre WebvsSelf-Hosted Metrics (SHM)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web | Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 18 488 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Fluent | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) needs more configuration.
Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web details →Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web, compare it with
Keep Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), compare it with