Calibre Webvsrebacklogs
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web | rebacklogs | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 18 485 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Fluent | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.
rebacklogs ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.
Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web details →rebacklogs details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web, compare it with
Keep rebacklogs, compare it with