Calibre Webvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 18 488 | 46 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 | +1 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Fluent | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 78/100 for Calibre Web, so it is the safer default.
mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web details →mitmproxy details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web, compare it with
Keep mitmproxy, compare it with