Calibre Web AutomatedvsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 508 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →Qtap details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with