Calibre Web Automatedvsfilestash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | filestash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #3 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 6 502 | 14 835 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +170 | +124 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 70/100 for filestash, so it is the safer default.
Calibre Web Automated ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for filestash.
If you want the quickest setup, filestash is easier to run; Calibre Web Automated needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated details →filestash details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep filestash, compare it with