ByteStashvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ByteStash | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #41 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 2 569 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
SonarQube scores 71/100 against 60/100 for ByteStash, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for ByteStash.
If you want the quickest setup, ByteStash is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.
SonarQube is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).
ByteStash details →SonarQube details →