ByteStashvsvLLM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ByteStash | vLLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #41 of 166 in Developer Tools | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 2 569 | 95 785 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +3 233 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
vLLM scores 91/100 against 60/100 for ByteStash, so it is the safer default.
vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for ByteStash.
If you want the quickest setup, ByteStash is easier to run; vLLM needs more configuration.
vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 233 stars in 30 days).
ByteStash details →vLLM details →