BunkerWebvstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BunkerWeb | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 78 in Security | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 135 | 16 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +249 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 49 |
| Latest release | v1.6.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 71/100 for BunkerWeb, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for BunkerWeb.
If you want the quickest setup, BunkerWeb is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
BunkerWeb details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep BunkerWeb, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with