budibasevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
budibase scores 74/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
budibase is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →UUSEC WAF details →