Node REDvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Node RED | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 23 790 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 9 |
| Latest release | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Node RED scores 81/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Node RED ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
Node RED is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Node RED details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Node RED, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with