budibasevstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 28 363 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
budibase scores 74/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.
budibase is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →transfer.sh details →