budibasevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 | 117 848 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →TradingAgents details →