budibasevsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 368 | 20 027 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
budibase scores 74/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.
budibase is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →Qinglong details →