budibasevsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
budibase scores 74/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for MCSManager.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.
budibase details →MCSManager details →