budibasevsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 364 | 30 096 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +697 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 79 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Infisical scores 78/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 75 for budibase.
If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+697 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →Infisical details →