Infisicalvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Infisical | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 30 118 | 65 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +702 | +313 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 79 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 78/100 for Infisical, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
Infisical is growing faster right now (+702 stars in 30 days).
Infisical details →nocodb details →