budibasevsHyperSwitch
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | HyperSwitch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 | 45 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +1 680 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, budibase is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 680 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →HyperSwitch details →