HyperSwitchvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 45 506 | 65 372 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 676 | +318 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch and nocodb score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with