bookwyrmvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →url-to-png details →