Mastodonvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mastodon | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 50 458 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
Mastodon details →url-to-png details →