bookwyrmvsIPFS Web UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | IPFS Web UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 1 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
IPFS Web UI scores 60/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →IPFS Web UI details →