IPFS Web UIvsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 50 457 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 38 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →Mastodon details →