bookorbitvstrip2g
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | trip2g | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 899 | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 221 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 221 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →trip2g details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep trip2g, compare it with