bookorbitvsskyvern
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | skyvern | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #3 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 877 | 23 293 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 247 | +235 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 26 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
skyvern scores 75/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; skyvern needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 247 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →skyvern details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep skyvern, compare it with