bookorbitvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 259 | +1 772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
bookorbit details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with