grimmoryvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grimmory | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 4 624 | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 | +1 772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 21 Sept 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 69/100 for grimmory, so it is the safer default.
grimmory ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, grimmory is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).
grimmory details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep grimmory, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with