bookorbitvsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 223 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →retroassembly details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep retroassembly, compare it with