Librumvsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Librum | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in E-book Management | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 5 318 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-2 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Librum scores 60/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Librum.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Librum needs more configuration.
retroassembly is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).
Librum details →retroassembly details →
Swap a project
Keep Librum, compare it with
Keep retroassembly, compare it with