bookorbitvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 223 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →QGIS Web Client details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with