bookorbitvsPictaria Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Pictaria Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #25 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 882 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 252 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.1 · 12 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 73/100 against 48/100 for Pictaria Server, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Pictaria Server.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Pictaria Server needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 252 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →Pictaria Server details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Pictaria Server, compare it with