bookorbitvsOperant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Operant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 264 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 73/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →Operant details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Operant, compare it with