bookwyrmvsOperant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | Operant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →Operant details →