bookorbitvsMDCz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | MDCz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #85 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 421 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 216 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.20.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 47/100 for MDCz, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for MDCz.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; MDCz needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 216 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →MDCz details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep MDCz, compare it with