bookorbitvsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 | 10 469 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 12 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 223 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →Healthchecks details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with