bookorbitvsHass-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Hass-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 902 | 351 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 224 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Hass-MCP needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 224 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →Hass-MCP details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with