BLE Monitorvsmetamcp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BLE Monitor | metamcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 2 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 3 |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
metamcp scores 61/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.
BLE Monitor ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.
If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; metamcp needs more configuration.
metamcp is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).
BLE Monitor details →metamcp details →
Swap a project
Keep BLE Monitor, compare it with
Keep metamcp, compare it with