BLE Monitorvsfrankframework
Two self-hosted Integration projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BLE Monitor | frankframework | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #3 of 3 in Integration |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 168 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 8 |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v10.2.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
BLE Monitor scores 60/100 against 50/100 for frankframework, so it is the safer default.
BLE Monitor ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for frankframework.
If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; frankframework needs more configuration.
BLE Monitor is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
BLE Monitor details →frankframework details →All Integration projects →
Swap a project
Keep BLE Monitor, compare it with
Keep frankframework, compare it with