bitmagnetvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bitmagnet | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Torrent | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 4 438 | 93 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +1 264 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1 · 21 May 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 59/100 for bitmagnet, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for bitmagnet.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; bitmagnet needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).
bitmagnet details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep bitmagnet, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with