Floodvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Flood | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Torrent | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 860 | 93 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +1 259 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 |
| Latest release | v4.16.3 · 17 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 65/100 for Flood, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Flood.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).
Flood details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Flood, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with