Beszelvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Beszel | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 26 620 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +935 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.21.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Beszel scores 81/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Beszel ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, Beszel is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
Beszel is growing faster right now (+935 stars in 30 days).
Beszel details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Beszel, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with