BentoPDFvsyoutube-dl-nas
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | youtube-dl-nas | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #27 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 181 | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 26.1029 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 50/100 for youtube-dl-nas, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for youtube-dl-nas.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; youtube-dl-nas needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →youtube-dl-nas details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep youtube-dl-nas, compare it with