BentoPDFvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 176 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with