Resume-Matchervswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Resume-Matcher | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Document Processing | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 912 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +404 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+404 stars in 30 days).
Resume-Matcher details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with