BentoPDFvsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 16 184 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +473 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+473 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with