BentoPDFvstextsnap
Two self-hosted Document Processing projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 16 180 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +481 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+481 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →textsnap details →All Document Processing projects →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep textsnap, compare it with