BentoPDFvsSSH & Web Terminal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | SSH & Web Terminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #30 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 16 184 | 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +485 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; SSH & Web Terminal needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →SSH & Web Terminal details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep SSH & Web Terminal, compare it with