SSH & Web TerminalvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SSH & Web Terminal | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 542 | 56 871 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +142 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; SSH & Web Terminal needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+142 stars in 30 days).
SSH & Web Terminal details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep SSH & Web Terminal, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with