BentoPDFvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 16 184 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +473 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+473 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with