PaddleOCRvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 91 869 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +428 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with