BentoPDFvsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 16 184 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +473 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 39 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+473 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →rudderstack details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep rudderstack, compare it with